Subject: Re: Sportsmanship and rules enforcement at GP Birmingham Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1998 17:14:56 -0800 From: Tracey Wise To: fkusumot@ix.netcom.com I am a professional magic player. I can say this with certainty in the fact that I've been to every PT event since Worlds 97, and as of recently have performed at such a level that I've made more than I've spent. This is not to say that PT magic is a full time job, but it's been a good way to put myself through school instead of taking some minimum wage job at a local greasy spoon. It is with this in mind that I tell you that Manuel Bevand's actions at PT Birmingham were in no way unusually harsh or wrong. Grand Prix Birmingham was a major tournament for which I'm sure Manuel payed more than a few dollars to play in (as a side note, while Manuel and I know one another, we run in different crowds on the tour, so this is not a personal defence), and in which he stood to make a decent amount of money if he performed well. Being a pro tour player aside, Manuel did what he had to do, within the rules, to win. I was talking to SteveOMS, whom I consider to be amongst the top 5 players in the world, about the matter of when to call over a judge at PT Chicago. Steve employs a policy (a smart one) of calling over a judge when ANYTHING outside the rules of the game happens, regardless of whether its drawing extra cards or inadvertantly knocking a land on the ground with an elbow. Pro Tour magic is a completely different animal than local $50 tourneys. While I agree that good sportsmanship and fun should be the premium for lower k tourneys, when you get into the realm of a Grand Prix, you're in a situation where the participants are not only playing for cash and a PT spot, but you are playing for Pro Tour Points. Manuel happens to be one of those players who is on the bubble with regards to getting to the top 50 in this manner of evaluation (the top 50 PT players for the last year with regards to points earned get invited to the next pro tour, aka The Gravy Train) and in as much, was not only playing for money and a spot, but concievably for a years worth of pro Tour births, a much more important prize in many regards than the $2000 the winner would be recieving. It is my opinion that once you get to level C (PTQ) or higher tourneys, Magic ceases to be a game and becomes more a competition, but the addition of the PTPoint factor to the allready intense PTQ atmosphere means that the game should be played properly. The following is a quote from Bruce Cowley's article: A few weeks back, in Atlanta, I was playing in the finals of a PTQ for Rome. I was playing Living Death, my opponent, Jody Dunville, was playing counter phoenix. It was the 1st game and while I had applied early pressure and had him down low, he was coming back and was starting to take control of the game. Now Jody is an immaculate player, the type who announces each and every phase, taps his lands 90 degrees, in short does everything you would expect from an opponent of that caliber. Except one turn he forgot to draw a card. The same offense that Jon Finkle got a game loss for at GP Austin. Now there were about 3 judges watching, and numerous spectators, but none of them noticeced. Neither did I. But Jody did, at the end of his turn, and said so. I guess I should have called him on it right? Instead I told him to go back to his draw phase and draw his card. It was obvious to me that this was an unintentional mistake. I lost that game. And went on to lose the match. But I would do it again in a heartbeat and I would hope the same would be done for me. end quote I have bad news for you Bruce, but both you and your opponent would be absolutely crushed on the Pro Tour. Not only that, but his failure to inform you, or your failure to inform a judge, are violations of the rules of magic, the game for which you were both trying to become a professional. I've seen you play before, and you aren't a bad player, but the fact is that once to get to an event where PT players are allowed to play (another difference between, PTQs and Grand Prixs) you have to expect a professional attitude, professional style rules enforcement, and professional consequences Hoping I'm wrong, but knowing, in this case, I'm probably not, Gary Wise