Subject: Unsolicited Article attached Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1998 06:32:53 PST From: "Albert Hendriks" albertgreat@hotmail.com To: webmaster@classicdojo.org[MISC]
I've played magic for a couple of years
and enjoyed it pretty much. I joined several small
tournaments and had some success with dojo-decks. Of
course, you're a better man if you play with your own
deck, but I thought I wasn't capable of building winning
decks. In fact, no-one is nowadays.
Because of an important change in my life,
I stopped playing magic last May. Last week, however,
I called a friend, Niels Veth, to visit him, and he
asked me to bring my cards. We played a couple of games,
but I got bored, so I started reading a new Inquest.
I found a nice combo, and I wanted to try to make a
deck around it. We did. Boy, did we have fun. Playtesting,
goldfishing, adjusting the deck.. The number of colors
ranged from 1 to 3. Finally, we found that the deck
was no longer improvable without an Urza's Saga checklist
(we used proxies for US cards that were mentioned explicitly
in the Inquest). It won a goldfish in 3-5 turns at
that time. We were really enthusiastic, and decided
to tell no-one about it, but to surprise everyone at
tournaments.
Today, I went to university to get a checklist
from the Internet. I read some article headers in newsgroups
and clicked on one that said "MoMa-decklist", just
because of the funny name. You can guess what happened.
It was almost exactly the same, except for some US
cards (Windfall), and for the Mox Diamonds (we used
Fellwar stones instead, 'cause we played with Mana
Severance and Dreamhalls). Even the details that, we
too, found, were already worked out (e.g. Mind over
Matter = keycard, not the Academy).
So here I'm sitting depressed, writing
this article. I don't know what to do:
1. Copy & play
2. Play our version
3. Sell my magic cards
Many people have been saying that magic is sick. Unfortunately, the only way to believe it is to find out yourself. And may I choose to play our or thedojo's version, are I then "contributing to the delinquency of type two" (quoting Jon Gording)?
Albert Hendriks